On 06/17/2014 05:26 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
After a few weekends of so-so results due to some issue with cleaning up
after some failure that didn't go quite right, I rebooted my system and
started another run using upstream libvirt, virt-test, and tp-libvirt
from sometime late Fri Jun 13.
The results were very good:
./run -t libvirt --install --tests virsh --no
virsh.dompmsuspend,virsh.volume_application
TESTS: 3660
TOTAL TIME: 104662.75 s (29:04:22)
TESTS PASSED: 3328
TESTS FAILED: 32
TESTS SKIPPED: 300
SUCCESS RATE: 99.05 %
FAILure summary
* 2 snapshot_disk
- Internal snapshot of running VM must include the memory state...
- To be fixed by PR #182
Reviewed & Merged
* 1 attach_detach_disk
- Fixed by PR#202
Already merged
* 4 vol_resize
- "Known issue" w/ BZ 1077068
* 1 snapshot_create_as
- acl test issue. investigated and posted PR #206
Reviewed & Merged
* 1 shutdown
- acl test issue - investigated and posted PR #207
Very similar with above one, merged.
* 9 schedinfo_qemu_posix
- "Known" - see PR #145 for some details. I think for this one since
the upstream patch request hasn't gone anywhere, perhaps this test ought
to be revisited to work within the existing constraints.
Okey, we can skip the checking in output of command.
Please refer to https://github.com/autotest/tp-libvirt/pull/208.
* 14 blockcopy
- Issue caused by an upstream change which is in the process of being
fixed. Although even though it'll be fixed, I may send a PR in order to
use the new syntax (details will be in the PR).
Thanx
I'm still avoiding the virsh.domsuspend test and I avoid the
volume_application because it still returns ERROR's for me for the
install part of the test. I think there's been many iterations to
attempt to fix.
If
_______________________________________________
Virt-test-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
_______________________________________________
Virt-test-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-test-devel
