On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Christophe Fergeau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 04:04:26PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> You do realize that vala is expecting it like this cause its the >> most usual convention in gobject world? Check similar functions in >> gtk+ for example: gtk_widget_get_child_visible(). > > gdk_keyval_is_lower? Ok it's the only one in gtk proper, but there are > other libraries out there using "is"
Thats irrelevant since gdk_keyval_is_lower() is *not* a getter for a gobject prop. >> I wouldn't want to >> do that extra work just to make the names of getters sound *slightly* >> better. > > Yep, better to put some extra mental work on people reading code using > these getters. It's generally an accumulation of small nice details or > small irritations that makes people think of a library as nice to use or > not. True but I don't think thats the case here since I'm sticking to the usual conventions. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
