On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Christophe Fergeau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Seems we won't get to an agreement on that one, so reluctant ACK on > > uglifying the C API to make Vala look cooler. > > Thanks! I already explained with proper examples how this is not > vala-specific at all but rather vala expecting you to follow the usual > gobject conventions regarding getters in general but you just have to > blame vala so its hard to reach an agreement indeed. :)
Well, this was your initial justification "agreed, "_is_" would be slightly better, but "_get_" is what vala wants!", that's just not a good justification at all to me. "this is the usual way of doing things" just sounded like an afterthought. You have to learn how to convince me :) Christophe
pgp7NiCUBGyfy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
