Friendly ping here. Since no further feedback, would it make sense to set up a vote on this proposal?
Thanks, - Enrico On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 9:55 AM Enrico Granata <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe the proposal was Acked-By and didn't receive any strong pushback > > The only open point of discussion was whether to rename the feature > flag to F_EMMC_LIFETIME in order to open the door for F_NVME_LIFETIME > I think, but I didn't hear any comment on that > > Thanks, > - Enrico > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 4:33 AM Cornelia Huck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 5 May 2021 13:37:26 -0600 > > Enrico Granata <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > > From: Enrico Granata <[email protected]> > > > Date: Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:37 PM > > > Subject: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk > > > lifetime metrics > > > To: <[email protected]> > > > Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, > > > <[email protected]>, > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the > > > original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC > > > spec which is not open > > > > > > Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields > > > added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to > > > make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime > > > metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification > > > > > > This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add > > > any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more > > > clear description of the meaning associated with those fields. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > Changes in v2: > > > - clarified JEDEC references; > > > - added VIRTIO_BLK prefix and cleaned up comment syntax; > > > - clarified reserved block references > > > > > > content.tex | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Do we have a consent here? I see the mails are not showing up on all of > > the lists, so I'm a bit confused regarding the state of this... > > >
