On Wed, Jul 14 2021, Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:37:26PM -0700, Enrico Granata wrote: >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: Enrico Granata <[email protected]> >> Date: Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:37 PM >> Subject: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk >> lifetime metrics >> To: <[email protected]> >> Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, >> <[email protected]>, >> <[email protected]> >> >> >> In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the >> original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC >> spec which is not open >> >> Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields >> added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to >> make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime >> metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification >> >> This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add >> any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more >> clear description of the meaning associated with those fields. >> >> Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <[email protected]> >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> - clarified JEDEC references; >> - added VIRTIO_BLK prefix and cleaned up comment syntax; >> - clarified reserved block references >> >> content.tex | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > Ping? > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <[email protected]>
[Enrico is currently on leave of absence] Is there any outstanding feedback from the linux-block folks? I've lost track of this, I'm afraid. (Your R-b is the only feedback I see on this list...) We can certainly put up a vote. This is one of the things I wanted to see fixed for the next release of the standard. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
