On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 06:13:55PM +0200, Alvaro Karsz wrote: > I think that I wasn't clear enough. > > I'm not saying that we should not define in the spec how to handle a > situation when a device receives both RX_SET and VQ_SET (or a driver > sends both). > I'm saying that I don't think that the driver should handle the > situation the way you described it: > > > When the driver prefers to use per virtqueue notifications coalescing, and > > if queue group (transmit or receive) level notification coalescing is > > enabled, driver SHOULD first disable device level notification coalescing. > > Or it should be, > > > > Virtqueue level notifications coalescing, and device level notifications > > can be enabled together. > > When both of them are enabled, per virtqueue notifications coalescing take > > priority over queue group level. > > This implies that we have 2 modes and have priorities. > > I think that if we want to refer to this situation in the spec, it > should be something like: > "A Device should use the last coalescing parameters received for a > virtqueue, regardless of the command used to deliver the parameters."
Your suggestion is good, the per-device command and the per-queue command need some examples and behavior definitions, I will add them to avoid some misunderstandings. Thanks. > (just an example to make the point). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
