On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 13:21:40 +0000 Parav Pandit <pa...@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is such a narrow usecase, I don't like burning > > "vq identifier" on this. How about we just say something along the lines of: > > > Ok. > > > > When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, this > > notification involves sending either the virtqueue index or the virtqueue > > config > > data to the device (method depending on the transport). > > > > And then "the data sent is a device supplied virtqueue config data". > > > Sounds fine. I will reword it. FYI in an other thread I proposed calling this a "cookie". Sorry for being late to the party. Yet again. Regards, Halil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
