On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 01:21:40PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 1:30 AM > > > > VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is such a narrow usecase, I don't like burning > > "vq identifier" on this. How about we just say something along the lines of: > > > Ok. > > > > When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, this > > notification involves sending either the virtqueue index or the virtqueue > > config > > data to the device (method depending on the transport). > > > > And then "the data sent is a device supplied virtqueue config data". > > > Sounds fine. I will reword it.
FWIW I like this more than coming up with a cookie term, it is definitely a more conservative approach. -- MST --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
