> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2023 9:39 AM > > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 01:28:40PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > This is not the objective to transport all PCI virtio fields over AQ. > > Transport VQ commands proposal commands and commands in this proposal > are just fine the way there without quoting it as "transport". > > I mean, it's a transport in a sense of where it will reside in e.g. > linux virtio stack - below virtio core. > We don't save much code there by reusing the same register layout of legacy > pci. > But let's at least make this feature complete, and then we'll see whether it > is > cleaner to reuse legacy layout or build a new one.
I don't follow your comment about "this feature complete". When you say _this_, it means the feature proposed in this patch of supporting legacy over PCI VFs? If so, anything missing in this proposal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
