Hi VirtualGL,
I am using virtualGL since some years now to get 3d-accelerated remote
visualization possible via TurboVNC on our frond-nodes of a compute-cluster via.
Just recently I was asked why remote 3d-accelerated desktop scenario is not
possible with multiple 3d-accelerated X-servers+VNC, each dedicated to a single
user?
I cannot answer this question as I would like to, as it seems to run fine:
We tested to run multiple 3d-accelerated X-servers on the same machine with a
single GPU without any problems.
glxgears showed 600 frames per second on both at the same time -> both X-server
where 3d-accelerated.
Why shouldn´t I go for multiple 3D-X-server (one for each user)
and send its framebuffer via VNC to the workstations
instead of using VirtualGL?
Best,
Jens Henrik
--
Dipl.-Ing. Jens Henrik Göbbert
IT Center - Computational Science & Engineering
Computer Science Department - Virtual Reality Group
Jülich Aachen Research Alliance - JARA-HPC
IT Center
RWTH Aachen University
Seffenter Weg 23
52074 Aachen, Germany
Phone: +49 241 80-24381
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.vr.rwth-aachen.de<http://www.vr.rwth-aachen.de>
http://www.jara.org<http://www.jara.org/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
VirtualGL-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-users
