On Thursday 02 April 2009, Chris Wright wrote: > * Rafael J. Wysocki ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Chris Wright wrote: > > > * Rafael J. Wysocki ([email protected]) wrote: > > > > This may be caused by the recent PM changes. Can you please test if > > > > commit > > > > 8efb8c76fcdccf5050c0ea059dac392789baaff2 is fine? > > > > > > I just tested on my t400, it's not[1]. See same symptoms as Arkadiusz. > > > Seems as if it responds to initial apci event, I see some disk activity, > > > then nothing (as if it tried to wakeup, then went back to sleep). > > > > > > [1] 15f7176eb1cccec0a332541285ee752b935c1c85 bad > > > fae3e7fba4c664b3a15f2cf15ac439e8d754afc2 good(ish) (display stays > > > blank) > > > > Hmm, can you also test commit 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f, > > please? > > Well, that's already included in 15f7176eb1cccec0a332541285ee752b935c1c85
Sorry for the misunderstanding, I thought the breakage might be introduced between 15f7176eb1cccec0a332541285ee752b935c1c85 and 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f, so I thought it would be a good idea to verify if 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f fails too. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
