* Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@sisk.pl) wrote:
> Sorry for the misunderstanding, I thought the breakage might be introduced
> between 15f7176eb1cccec0a332541285ee752b935c1c85 and
> 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f, so I thought it would be a good
> idea to verify if 0a0c5168df270a50e3518e4f12bddb31f8f5f38f fails too.

Ah, sure.  It fails too (both test_suspend=mem and regular suspend/resume).
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to