On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:12:23 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> virtio is communicating with a virtual "device" that actually runs on
> another host processor. Thus SMP barriers can be used to control
> memory access ordering.
> 
> Where possible, we should use SMP barriers which are more lightweight than
> mandatory barriers, because mandatory barriers also control MMIO effects on
> accesses through relaxed memory I/O windows (which virtio does not use)
> (compare specifically smp_rmb and rmb on x86_64).

Xen had a similar issue, in that UP guests running on SMP hosts need to issue
SMP barriers.  Is this not also a requirement for virtio?

But I'm not sure what came out of the discussion: Jeremy?

Cheers,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to