On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:01:09AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:12:23 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > virtio is communicating with a virtual "device" that actually runs on
> > another host processor. Thus SMP barriers can be used to control
> > memory access ordering.
> > 
> > Where possible, we should use SMP barriers which are more lightweight than
> > mandatory barriers, because mandatory barriers also control MMIO effects on
> > accesses through relaxed memory I/O windows (which virtio does not use)
> > (compare specifically smp_rmb and rmb on x86_64).
> 
> Xen had a similar issue, in that UP guests running on SMP hosts need to issue
> SMP barriers.  Is this not also a requirement for virtio?

Of course it is. That's why I have ifdef CONFIG_SMP and use
mandatory barriers on UP.

> But I'm not sure what came out of the discussion: Jeremy?
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to