On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 07:58:50PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 2:59 PM > > To: KY Srinivasan > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig; [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Haiyang Zhang; > > Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD) > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/49] Staging: hv: vmbus: Get rid of the unused > > wrapper - > > vmbus_onchannel_event() > > > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:59:32PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 7:15 PM > > > > To: KY Srinivasan > > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Haiyang > > > > Zhang; > > > > Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD) > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/49] Staging: hv: vmbus: Get rid of the unused > > > > wrapper > > - > > > > vmbus_onchannel_event() > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:49:48PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > > > > > Now, get rid of the unused wrapper - vmbus_onchannel_event(). > > > > > > > > I'd merge this into the previous patch. In general your patch split > > > > seem a little too fine grained to me in general. When you remove a > > > > wrapper you can inline it into the callsite directly, if you clean up a > > > > function directly inlining it into the helper is fine, etc. > > > > > > > I agree with you that some of these patches are too fine grained; but > > > I thought that was what was expected - "one change per patch". > > > > Yes, but don't take it to an extreme, like you have done here :) > > Will do in the future. Should I re-spin any of the patches in this set to > make them less > "fine-grained".
No, they are fine as-is. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
