> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sasha Levin [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 9:02 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Haiyang Zhang
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 097/117] Staging: hv: storvsc: Add code to handle IDE 
> devices
> using the storvsc driver
> 
> On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 12:57 +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 10:05 PM
> > > To: KY Srinivasan
> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Haiyang Zhang
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 097/117] Staging: hv: storvsc: Add code to handle IDE
> devices
> > > using the storvsc driver
> > >
> > > Thanks, this looks much cleaner than the initial variant.
> > >
> > > > +       if (dev_is_ide) {
> > > > +               storvsc_get_ide_info(device, &target, &path);
> > > > +               host_dev->path = device_info.path_id;
> > > > +               host_dev->target = device_info.target_id;
> > > > +       } else {
> > > > +               host_dev->path = device_info.path_id;
> > > > +               host_dev->target = device_info.target_id;
> > > > +       }
> > >
> > > Is using the device_info values in both branches intentional?  If so
> > > there's no need to have these assignments duplicated.
> >
> > While we set the values in both the branches, the value set is different;
> > The IDE side encodes the bits differently and is appropriately parsed in the
> > function storvsc_get_ide_info().
> 
> Is think that what Christoph meant was simplifying it to:
> 
>       if (dev_is_ide)
>               storvsc_get_ide_info(device, &target, &path);
> 
>       host_dev->path = device_info.path_id;
>       host_dev->target = device_info.target_id;

Good point! It is still too early in the morning for me. 
Greg, if it is ok with you, in the interest of keeping the patch
cops happy, I can submit a patch for this on top of this series.

Regards,

K. Y
> 
> --
> 
> Sasha.
> 

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to