On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 09:32:18 +1030 Rusty Russell <ru...@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Rafael Aquini <aqu...@redhat.com> writes: > > + * virtballoon_migratepage - perform the balloon page migration on behalf > > of > > + * a compation thread. (called under page lock) > > > + if (!mutex_trylock(&vb->balloon_lock)) > > + return -EAGAIN; > > Erk, OK... Not really. As is almost always the case with a trylock, it needs a comment explaining why we couldn't use the far superior mutex_lock(). Data: this reader doesn't know! > > + /* balloon's page migration 1st step -- inflate "newpage" */ > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&vb_dev_info->pages_lock, flags); > > + balloon_page_insert(newpage, mapping, &vb_dev_info->pages); > > + vb_dev_info->isolated_pages--; > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vb_dev_info->pages_lock, flags); > > + vb->num_pfns = VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE; > > + set_page_pfns(vb->pfns, newpage); > > + tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq); > > tell_host does wait_event(), so you can't call it under the page_lock. > Right? Sleeping inside lock_page() is OK. More problematic is that GFP_KERNEL allocation. iirc it _should_ be OK. Core VM uses trylock_page() and the filesystems shouldn't be doing a synchronous lock_page() in the pageout path. But I suspect it isn't a well-tested area. > You probably get away with it because current qemu will service you > immediately. You could spin here in this case for the moment. > > There's a second call to tell_host(): > > > + /* > > + * balloon's page migration 2nd step -- deflate "page" > > + * > > + * It's safe to delete page->lru here because this page is at > > + * an isolated migration list, and this step is expected to happen here > > + */ > > + balloon_page_delete(page); > > + vb->num_pfns = VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE; > > + set_page_pfns(vb->pfns, page); > > + tell_host(vb, vb->deflate_vq); > > The first one can be delayed, the second one can be delayed if the host > didn't ask for VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_MUST_TELL_HOST (qemu doesn't). > > We could implement a proper request queue for these, and return -EAGAIN > if the queue fills. Though in practice, it's not important (it might > help performance). _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
