On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:23:27PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 12:53:22PM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote: > > > <SNIP> > > > If you get the barrier issue sorted out then feel free to add > > > > > > Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> > > > > > > > I believe we can drop the barriers stuff, as the locking scheme is now > > provinding > > enough protection against collisions between isolation page scanning and > > balloon_leak() page release (the major concern that has lead to the barriers > > originally) > > > > I'll refactor this patch with no barriers and ensure a better commentary on > > the > > aforementioned locking scheme and resubmit, if it's OK to everyone > > > > Sounds good to me. When they are dropped again feel free to stick my ack > on for the compaction and migration parts. The virtio aspects are up to > someone else :) >
Andrew, If we get no further objections raised on dropping those barriers, would you like me to resubmit the whole series rebased on the latest -next, or just this (new) refactored patch? -- Rafael _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
