Amit Shah <[email protected]> writes:
> On (Fri) 19 Jul 2013 [18:17:32], Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 07/19/2013 03:48 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
>> > On (Fri) 19 Jul 2013 [15:03:50], Jason Wang wrote:
>> >> On 07/19/2013 04:16 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
>> >>> Between poll() being called and processed, the port can be unplugged.
>> >>> Check if this happened, and bail out.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <[email protected]>
>> >>> ---
>> >>>  drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 4 ++++
>> >>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> >>>
>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c 
>> >>> b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> >>> index 7728af9..1d4b748 100644
>> >>> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> >>> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> >>> @@ -967,6 +967,10 @@ static unsigned int port_fops_poll(struct file 
>> >>> *filp, poll_table *wait)
>> >>>          unsigned int ret;
>> >>>  
>> >>>          port = filp->private_data;
>> >>> +        if (!port->guest_connected) {
>> >>> +                /* Port was unplugged before we could proceed */
>> >>> +                return POLLHUP;
>> >>> +        }
>> >>>          poll_wait(filp, &port->waitqueue, wait);
>> >>>  
>> >>>          if (!port->guest_connected) {
>> >> Looks still racy here. Unlike port_fops_read() which check
>> >> will_read_block(). If unplug happens after the check but before the
>> >> poll_wait(), caller will be blocked forever.
>> > unplug_port() calls wake_up_interruptible on the waitqueue.
>> 
>> I mean the following cases:
>
> (formatting to fit properly:)
>
>> 
>> CPU0:                                CPU1: unplug_port()
>> 
>> if (!port->guest_connected) {
>>     return POLLHUP;
>> }
>>                                      wake_up_interruptiable()
>> 
>> poll_wait(filp, &port->waitqueue, wait);
>
> Agreed, this can happen.  I can't think of a way to resolve this.  One
> way would be to remove the waitqueue (port->waitqueue = NULL in
> unplug_port()), but I'm not sure of the effect on the other parts
> yet.  I'll leave this one for later analysis.

No, you are confused by the name, I think,

poll_wait() doesn't actually wait.  It's more like a poll_enqueue().

Cheers,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to