Hi Emil,

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 02:40:11PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 30 November 2017 at 23:49, Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:56:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > submit it to dri-devel.
> >
> A crazy idea, mostly towards Tedd and Sudip:
> Start small and build gradually. An example split for separate patch series:
>  - one HW, basic setup + atomic KMS
>  - add second HW
>  - more KMS features
>  - fancy memory management
>  - 2D/3D/other acceleration
> The driver as seen above tries to do all of the above (almost, it's not 
> atomic)
> at once - 40k loc.
> Someone familiar with the code can quickly split it up and while doing
> so, feed it through checkpatch.

I can try but will be very tough since I have to go through the code to
get familiar with it and, as mentioned before, its not part of my dayjob,
so time will be a problem. Developing from scratch takes much more time
than fixing something.

> Current code is _very_ far from kernel coding style, plus the
> copyright blurp is very disturbing:

I will fix the coding style before my first submission to dri-devel,
which should be in January after I have setup my desktop with the
hardware for testing.

The copyright thing - I am sure Teddy can talk to his company and will
confirm that we can change it to the way kernel code is done.

Virtualization mailing list

Reply via email to