On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 01:54:29PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:19:31 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Andrew, were your questions answered? If yes could I bother you for an ack 
> > on this?
> > 
> 
> Still not very happy that readers are told that "this function may
> sleep" when it clearly doesn't do so.  If we wish to be able to change
> it to sleep in the future then that should be mentioned.  And even put a
> might_sleep() in there, to catch people who didn't read the comments...
> 
> Otherwise it looks OK.

Oh, might_sleep with a comment explaining it's for the future sounds
good to me. I queued this - Wei, could you post a patch on top pls?

-- 
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to