It's no longer required to use nth_page() when iterating pages within a
single SG entry, so let's drop the nth_page() usage.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursu...@ursulin.net>
Cc: David Airlie <airl...@gmail.com>
Cc: Simona Vetter <sim...@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
index c16a57160b262..031d7acc16142 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ __i915_gem_object_get_page(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, 
pgoff_t n)
        GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_struct_page(obj));
 
        sg = i915_gem_object_get_sg(obj, n, &offset);
-       return nth_page(sg_page(sg), offset);
+       return sg_page(sg) + offset;
 }
 
 /* Like i915_gem_object_get_page(), but mark the returned page dirty */
-- 
2.50.1


Reply via email to