On 22.08.25 03:59, Damien Le Moal wrote:
On 8/22/25 05:06, David Hildenbrand wrote:
It's no longer required to use nth_page() when iterating pages within a
single SG entry, so let's drop the nth_page() usage.
Cc: Damien Le Moal <dlem...@kernel.org>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <cas...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
---
drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
index 7fc407255eb46..9f5d0f9f6d686 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static void ata_pio_sector(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
offset = qc->cursg->offset + qc->cursg_ofs;
/* get the current page and offset */
- page = nth_page(page, (offset >> PAGE_SHIFT));
+ page += offset / PAGE_SHIFT;
Shouldn't this be "offset >> PAGE_SHIFT" ?
Thanks for taking a look!
Yeah, I already reverted back to "offset >> PAGE_SHIFT" after Linus
mentioned in another mail in this thread that ">> PAGE_SHIFT" is
generally preferred because the compiler cannot optimize as much if
offset would be a signed variable.
So the next version will have the shift again.
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
