On Thursday 12 January 2006 11:31, Anthony Walker wrote: > > Perhaps it is related to the older udev in use. If the following output > does confirm this theory I will have to see how I can upgrade udev and > hopefully not break anything else in the process. > ... > 249 visdn-timer > 250 visdn-timer > 251 visdn-timer > 252 visdn-timer > 253 visdn-timer
All those reservations for visdn-timer are suspect. They remember me of a bug I solved quite some time ago. Are you sure you are running a recent snapshot? Make sure there is no garbage in /lib/modules/.../extra/, the module_install target sometimes puts there garbage like your home directory, it's a bug I'm going to solve soon. A reboot would be recommendable, anyway. Bye, _______________________________________________ Visdn-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
