> oh oh!!!! > this suggestion is very very interesting to me!!! > so now i realize that i never rm-moded lapd! > thnx very much!!
Any reason why lapd and kfifo are not prefixed by 'visdn_'? I only ask because as is I would have to remove them manually in my unload script. > rmmod visdn-vgsm > + rmmod visdn-vgsm > ERROR: Module visdn_vgsm does not exist in /proc/modules It seems a bit of a waste that visdn_configurator loads the hardware drivers when the ones that are required should have been loaded automatically by the operating system, and that the ones that aren't required still load when the hardware isn't present and (presumably) consume system resources. How would a patch to remove the modprobe for the 4 hardware drivers from visdn_configurator be viewed? James _______________________________________________ Visdn-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
