Hello again,

> 
>> Coming to section 2.3 on Audio, I have already stated on this ML 
>> (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet/current/msg00548.html) that I 
>> strongly believe the priorities you identify in the document are not in the 
>> right order. I cannot think of a 'future' RPS which is not capable of 
>> reliably supporting audio from remote attendees (both those who have to give 
>> presentations and those who just want to make sporadic comments).  I know 
>> this brings in some technical obstacles, but I nonetheless insist on this 
>> point. 
>> With respect to the specific requirements you identify:
>> 
>> **Requirement 07-20**: The RPS MUST enable relay of messages from IM
>>   to the mic to be able to happen as quickly as if the remote attendee
>>   was local.
>> 
>> 
>> It is not clear to me what you mean by "as quickly as if the remote attendee 
>> was local".
>> From a technical standpoint, this should translate in something similar to 
>> what I was proposing in the already cited mail, i.e. a solution which 
>> automatically announces a request for attention coming, via the jabber room, 
>> from a remote: in a few words, if a remote writes a sentence in the chat and 
>> lets it be preceded by the [mic] prefix, the RPS should automatically play a 
>> predefined 'attention sound' inside the room.
>> 
>> **Requirement 07-21**: The person relaying from IM to the mic must be
>>   available throughout the WG meeting.  To date, this has been done by
>>   WG volunteers in the room.  In the future, it could be done the same
>>   way, or maybe could be facilitated by hiring people to attend
>>   meetings for the specific purpose of being IM-to-mic scribes, 
>> 
>> 
>> this part seems to be out of scope for the RPS
>>   or maybe could be done with tools that allow copy-and-paste of text from
>>   IM to a speech synthesizer that reads it to the room.
> 
> There was consensus in the earlier discussion against what you "strongly 
> believe". You might want to bring this up again in IETF Last Call. If there 
> is consensus then that having remote attendees voice in the room, then there 
> will also need to be a major reworking of the document, particularly the 
> floor control parts (as you point out later in your message).

I see. If this was the consensus, then my voice will keep on being "clamans in 
deserto" until last call.

Simon

> 
> --Paul Hoffman

                                                               _\\|//_
                                                              ( O-O )
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o00~~(_)~~00o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                                Simon Pietro Romano
                                         Universita' di Napoli Federico II
                                     Computer Engineering Department 
                     Phone: +39 081 7683823 -- Fax: +39 081 7683816
                                           e-mail: [email protected]

                    <<Molti mi dicono che lo scoraggiamento Ë l'alibi degli 
                    idioti. Ci rifletto un istante; e mi scoraggio>>. Magritte.
                                                     oooO
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(   )~~~ Oooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                                         \ (            (   )
                                                          \_)          ) /
                                                                       (_/





_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet

Reply via email to