On 9/24/12 6:43 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Sep 24, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> wrote:

On 9/24/12 4:55 PM, Simon Pietro Romano wrote:
Here we go again,


**Requirement 07-67**: Given that interim meetings are often run
  without the help of the IETF Secretariat, making these recordings
MUST be easy for WG chairs.


Why should the chairs bother about the recordings?

Because if an interim does not have a recording, it has a significant
negative effect on the WG's progress.

Sure...actually this part of my comment was 'propaedeutical' to the one
which follows.


I think the RPS should be capable of making recordings in an
automated fashion. The chairs
should just don't care about the inner workings.

How do you see that working? If there is an interim meeting that was
not coordinated through the IETF Secretariat, how could the RPS "make
recordings in an automated fashion"?

...sometimes magic happens!

Perhaps a standard template for creating an interim meeting conference, that 
sets recording by default - to be started automatically.

The requirement is discussing interims that are not coordinated with the IETF. 
Are you suggesting that these would have to be done through an IETF-supported 
audio system, regardless of the location where they are held? If so, I agree 
that a template would work. However, that would also limit chairs to being in 
places that can hook into the IETF's system. Is that a reasonable trade-off?

Well, maybe I am missing something.
AFAIK the current effort is to specify some tools.
So if we are talking about interims in that context, then it must be interims supported by the tools being specified.

I guess that is independent of where the server is. Either way the tool could create a conference that is set to automatically record.

If the conference is set up on a server without the ability to record then of course it won't get recorded. If it hurts, don't do it.

        Thanks,
        Paul

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet

Reply via email to