Fred Baker (fred) <[email protected]> wrote: > video content less active (limit it to slide projection as opposed to a > human face, or change the codec, or have the human able to turn it off > without losing audio, etc). If we have packet sequence numbers, maybe > we want to capture realtime statistics on packet lose, delay variation, > and so on.
If we could have all slides uploaded before the meeting, then we wouldn't
have to project the VGA signal, but could project remote controlled PDF
instead. I think that meetecho did this before.
I like the MOS ideas.
> Part of this also has to do with the chair's "cockpit". From Lee and my
> perspective chairing v6ops on Monday, life was pretty busy. My laptop
> was projecting slides, and I was interacting with speakers and people
> in the room. In the room we had a jabber scribe and someone taking
> notes on what is oddly called an Etherpad. Lee had jabber in a pane,
> the Etherpad on a pane, his own notes on a pane, and meetecho control
> on a separate laptop. I didn't actually bring it (intended to but
> managed to leave it in my room in an overflow hotel), but I usually
> have an iPad for my own notes. Add to that Lee being able to chase the
> blue sheets, interact with the A/V team, or otherwise run around the
> room, and - well, let's just say I'm glad I have a co-chair. It takes
> two. At this point, I'm wondering how to simplify all that. Not
> offering suggestions right now, but I think we need to think about that
> in the context of virtualizing meetings.
1) note takers could be remote.
2) why did Lee have both etherpad and his own notes?
3) I like etherpad and use it regularly, but couldn't notes go into jabber?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
