For someone like me who has not kept track of what technology is exactly
used for remote hubs, whats the best URL to catch up ?
Eg: For the use-cases discussed on this thread such as developing world
hubs whee i guess the issue is not only ability not to travel but also
inability to
have individual remote participant HW/network connection, i can't quute see how
the first instance of a remote hub should need to be anything different than a
single remote participant hardware ("notebook") in a room, connected to
projector
and noise cancelling speakerphone and a user acting as the remote hub admin in
front of it managing requests for comments from other participants in the room.
Aka: nothing that looks different to the WG chair than an individual remote
participant called "Room Foobar in Faraway Town".
Cheers
Toerless
Disclaimer: Its much easier to have an opinion if you do not understand the
problem.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:13:22AM -0400, Joly MacFie wrote:
> Just on a side note. ICANN recently bailed on remote hubs.
>
> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann-discontinues-remote-hubs-at-public-meetings
>
> Basically their problem was they tried interactive hubs and 1) it was two
> much work at center 2) remote hubs are technically not so easy for non a/v
> people to handle 3) attendance was not what they had hoped.
>
> Myself, I think that individual remote participation is usually a better
> experience in terms of interactive, except in some connection challenged
> locations. However like the meetings themselves, a hub's value is very
> much in the f2f 'hallway' discussions.
>
> ICANN's solution is to organize post event 'readouts' in remote locations,
> where presumably the f2f factor can be sustained.
>
> j
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Christian O'Flaherty <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm interested and I'll be available on Friday's breakfast
> >
> > Sent from Phone
> >
> > On Jul 10, 2017, at 4:51 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > And it turns out that Thurs breakfast isn't open. My apologies for the
> > suggested conflict.
> >
> > Monday or Friday breakfast are possible as are Mon or Thurs lunch for me.
> > First, let's see who is interested and see if any of those times work.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alia
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Alia Atlas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Is there interest in getting together at IETF 99 to discuss remote hubs
> >> and local communities and related activities?
> >>
> >> For a time, I'd suggest the Thurs morning breakfast slot - 8am to 9:15am.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >> Alia
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
