On Friday, 11/11/2005 at 11:05 EST, Duane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still stand by what i previously said. since IBM did SSL support > for TCPIP on z/OS, IBM should do it for TCPIP on z/VM. > Why cheat on system of the same support. This is not like we are > asking for something new to TCPIP on VM. IBM did it once, now do it > again. Since it was already done once, it should not cost that much > more to do the right thing by making it available native (without > necessity of linux) on VM. The VM customers should not be having to > ask for it to be done. > > C'mon IBM!
Duane, you are assuming that the underlying system designs of z/VM and z/OS are the same - they are not. Some applications can move back and forth between z/OS and z/VM with minimal hassles. *System* code, on the other hand, does not. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
