-----Original Message-----
From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 10:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: CMS SIZEI have a simple question for anyone that has z/VM 5.2 running.
I seem to remember someone saying that the size of CMS machines needs to be increased on 5.2.
I am sure the validity of that statement depends on what release one is on before going to 5.2.
I am on z/VM 4.3.
The book states that the minimum for 4.3 and 5.2 are both 2M to IPL CMS and 20M for IPL 190.Most of my 100+ CMS users are at 8M now.
Will 8M suffice or should it be virtualized to 16M? Any opinions?Thanks
__________________________________________________________________
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside VM-List for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
Title: Message
This
was because of TCP/IP's expanded usage of C. Testing showed doing PING and
NETSTAT commands may need up to 5M more. IBM Level-2 suggested going to
32M (as much as 64M is will not expand what was called the page and segment
tables).
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
- CMS SIZE Huegel, Thomas
- Re: CMS SIZE Davis, Larry
- Re: CMS SIZE Steve Gentry
- Re: CMS SIZE Stracka, James (GTI)
- Re: CMS SIZE Michael Donovan
- Re: CMS SIZE Schuh, Richard
