Re: CMS SIZE

[Schuh, Richard]

Title: Message

It would appear that the real answer is that most users will probably run just fine with their current machine sizes. It is the ones using TCP/IP who may need larger machines.   Regards, Richard Schuh   -----Original Message----- From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Stracka, James (GTI) Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 8:06 AM To: VMESA-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: CMS SIZE   This was because of TCP/IP's expanded usage of C.  Testing showed doing PING and NETSTAT commands may need up to 5M more.  IBM Level-2 suggested going to 32M (as much as 64M is will not expand what was called the page and segment tables). -----Original Message----- From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 10:47 AM To: VMESA-L@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: CMS SIZE I have a simple question for anyone that has z/VM 5.2 running. I seem to remember someone saying that the size of CMS machines needs to be increased on 5.2. I am sure the validity of that statement depends on what release one is on before going to 5.2. I am on z/VM 4.3. The book states that the minimum for 4.3 and 5.2 are both 2M to IPL CMS and 20M for IPL 190. Most of my 100+ CMS users are at 8M now. Will 8M suffice or should it be virtualized to 16M? Any opinions? Thanks     __________________________________________________________________ << ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside VM-List for me You can use it too - and it's FREE!  http://www.ellaforspam.com If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/