At 04:03 PM 3/1/00 -0500, lane @ DUPHY4.Physics.Drexel.Edu wrote:
>"Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The only patch that was omitted because of my patching skills I repeat here
> > (still don't know why applying it failed):
> >
> > --- t/pragma/warn/pp_ctl.orig Tue Feb 29 12:43:44 2000
> > +++ t/pragma/warn/pp_ctl Tue Feb 29 13:01:22 2000
>
>Did you look at the file to see if the patch failure made sense?
>The usual problem I have with generating patches is translations
>from tabs to spaces, but I generate the patches with
> gnu_diff "-uBb" oldfile newfile >patchfile
Your patch had extra space in front of the lines surrounding the change for
some reason. Even applying with patch -l didn't work. Just curious, did
this fix a test error?
Here it is yet again after applying by hand and creating another diff.
--- t/pragma/warn/pp_ctl_orig Wed Mar 1 17:52:37 2000
+++ t/pragma/warn/pp_ctl Wed Mar 1 18:02:10 2000
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
fred() if $a++ < 200
}
- fred()
+ fred();
(in cleanup) foo bar
package Foo;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
fred() if $a++ < 200
}
-fred()
+fred();
EXPECT
Deep recursion on subroutine "main::fred" at - line 6.
########
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
fred() if $a++ < 200
}
-fred()
+fred();
EXPECT
########
# pp_ctl.c
[End of Patch.]
_______________________________________________
Craig A. Berry
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
