At 07:20 AM 3/10/00 -0500, Charles Lane wrote:
>It's worse for a child writing to a parent that has closed its input;
>the child has no way to tell that the parent has taken that action,
>and (in the parent) we don't have a way to $CANCEL or otherwise have
>the child's $QIO return an error.
Maybe we should nuke the child when we close the filehandle open to it?
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- progress report on piping on VMS Charles Lane
- Re: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Bailey
- Re: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Lane
- Re: progress report on piping on VMS Dan Sugalski
- Re: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Lane
- Re: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Bailey
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Carl Friedberg
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Lane
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Carl Friedberg
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Bailey
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Dan Sugalski
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Carl Friedberg
- Re: progress report on piping on VMS lane
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Carl Friedberg
