> So what do we do? Some options:
> 1. use vmsish 'messages' off by default -> no VMS messages
> 2. use ??? '?quietude?' off by default -> VMS messages
> 3. use vmsish 'messages' ON by default (violating Dan's rule)
>
> I don't think the ??? should be "unixish". We're not playing in their
> sandbox, we shouldn't use their namespace. But it beats me what pragma
> name we could use that is sensible, off by default, and implies getting
> the VMSish error messages. Time to hit the thesaurus.
It's a bit technical, but we could say
use vmsish 'inhib_msg'
I still like the 'messages', on by default, best -- I wonder how strongly
Larry feels about the principle?
Regards,
Charles Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Carl Friedberg
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Lane
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Carl Friedberg
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Bailey
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Dan Sugalski
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Carl Friedberg
- Re: progress report on piping on VMS lane
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Carl Friedberg
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Lane
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Dan Sugalski
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Bailey
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS PVHP
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Jordan Henderson
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Dan Sugalski
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Bailey
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Lane
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Dan Sugalski
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Bailey
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS lane
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS PVHP
- RE: progress report on piping on VMS Charles Bailey
