At 12:28 PM 3/21/00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Thanks for the clarification. Yet another reason not to upgrade (5.6.0
>doesn't build on OS/390 FWIW).
Does it fail this way if you *don't* use default filetyping?
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels hoffman
- Re: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels Craig A. Berry
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels PVHP
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels Craig A. Berry
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels Dan Sugalski
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels PVHP
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels Craig A. Berry
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels Dan Sugalski
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels Carl Friedberg
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels Craig A. Berry
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels Dan Sugalski
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labe... Craig A. Berry
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels PVHP
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labe... Craig A. Berry
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels PVHP
- RE: Perl_cando(), rooted logicals, and volume labels Carl Friedberg
