Charles, Wow, you've been busy. At 01:52 PM 3/28/00 -0500, Charles Lane wrote: >+ I'm using LIB$(GET|FREE)_VM here so that we can allocate and deallocate >+ inside an AST routine without worrying about reentrancy and which Perl >+ memory allocator is being used. Mixing these with malloc() used to be a no-no; does the fact that you have them in an AST routine allow you to dodge that restriction? _______________________________________________ Craig A. Berry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Charles Lane
- Re: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Craig A. Berry
- Re: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Craig A. Berry
- RE: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Jordan Henderson
- RE: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods lane
- Re: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods lane
- Re: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Craig A. Berry
- Re: [PATCH] Perl 5.6.0: VMS piping mods Dan Sugalski
