"Craig A. Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Isn't the problem that if MMS TEST defines or redefines PERL_ROOT and > you then proceed (as would ordinarily be the logical next step) to do > an MMS INSTALL you will be installing the build tree on top of itself > rather than in wherever PERL_ROOT originally pointed? You're safe with MM[SK], since each invocation spawns off a subprocess in which the commands get executed, so process logicals won't propagate from one run to the next. You may get bitten my some versions of Make which build a DCL procedure and then execute it in the current process. (Dunno whether anyone's using them; it's been a _long_ time since we supported make for VMS perl. I hope David Denholm's still well out there somewhere.) Regards, Charles Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V7.1 PVHP
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... lane
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_A... Charles Bailey
- Re[2]: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AX... jpeacock
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... PVHP
- RE: Re[2]: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VM... PVHP
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... Charles Lane
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_A... Craig A. Berry
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... lane
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... Charles Bailey
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... Charles Lane
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... lane
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... PVHP
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... PVHP
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... PVHP
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... Charles Lane
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... Charles Bailey
- Re: [ID 20000330.044] Not OK: perl v5.6.0 on VMS_AXP V... Charles Lane
