In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on Fri, 12 May 2000 10:18:15 -0400, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A good idea. I should point out that it's not the VMS debugging info per se > that makes perl slower, it's the fact that we turn all optimizations off > that hurts. Good info to know. > If you did an MMS INSTALL into your home directory (or anywhere, really) > you don't need to reinstall the thing to move it to a different disk. Just > do a BACKUP of the tree from where it is to where it should be and you'll > be fine. Ok, I did the compile, test, and install in the same tree. Won't backup put all the objects, etc., into the new production tree? I thought the install would only move the executables, etc., making the production tree shorter? Does the compile tree need to be separate from the install tree? Thank you very much for the help, Ed James [EMAIL PROTECTED] TeleCommunications Systems, Inc. voice 410-295-1919 275 West Street, Suite 400 fax 410-280-1094 Annapolis, MD 21401-1740
Re: Perl 5.6.0 "Build VMS-Debug version: Y"
Ed James, TCS Inc, 410-295-1919, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 12 May 2000 07:38:44 -0700
- Perl 5.6.0 "Build ... Ed James, TCS Inc, 410-295-1919, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Perl 5.6.0 &qu... PVHP
- Re: Perl 5.6.0 &qu... Ed James, TCS Inc, 410-295-1919, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Perl 5.6.0... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl 5.6.0 &qu... Ed James, TCS Inc, 410-295-1919, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Perl 5.6.0... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl 5.6.0 &qu... PVHP
- Re: Perl 5.6.0 &qu... PVHP
- Re: Perl 5.6.0 &qu... PVHP
