OK I checked my VMS account and I have Bytelm of 64000 (which strikes
me as probably high rather than low). I do have Pbytelm of 300; is that
the one that needs to be upped?
John Peacock
p.s. full VMS settings:
Maxjobs: 0 Fillm: 200 Bytlm: 64000
Maxacctjobs: 0 Shrfillm: 0 Pbytlm: 300
Maxdetach: 0 BIOlm: 150 JTquota: 4096
Prclm: 8 DIOlm: 150 WSdef: 2000
Prio: 4 ASTlm: 250 WSquo: 4000
Queprio: 0 TQElm: 25 WSextent: 16384
CPU: (none) Enqlm: 2000 Pgflquo: 1500000
p.p.s. Yes that Pgflquo is rather large; I was doing some huge RMS file
dumps and loads and that was what the vendor suggested to fix problems.
Jordan Henderson wrote:
>
> Right, that was one of the suggestions.
>
> What do people think about production environments here? There are
> MBX deadlock situations with small mailbox sizes, right?
>
> Should we be setting BYTLM much higher for accounts that might be
> runnng perl now? Even if you're not running the piping code, in
> preparation for it?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:47 PM
> > To: Jordan Henderson
> > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Re: extra LFs in test output (was Re: current status of 6919
> > with3 patches on DECC V6.0-001)
> >
> >
> > The suggested "$DEFINE PERL_MBX_SIZE 256" eliminated the
> > Fatal VMS Error
> > messages on my system.
> >
> > John Peacock
> >
