At 11:26 AM 11/29/2000 -0500, Charles Lane wrote: >The patch also has some bits to clean up the mess after the tests. Note that the bleadperl that just came out has already done this, so you may need to reformulate the patch against that. [ 7913] By: jhi on 2000/11/29 03:16:59 Log: Use "1 while unlink" so that VMS gets clean, too. Branch: perl ! t/lib/filter-util.t ____________________________________________________________________________
- RE: [ID 20001127.007] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7891 on Charles Lane
- RE: [ID 20001127.007] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7891 o... Charles Lane
- RE: [ID 20001127.007] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL78... Craig A. Berry
- RE: [ID 20001127.007] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL78... Craig A. Berry
- RE: [ID 20001127.007] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7891 o... Carl Friedberg
- RE: [ID 20001127.007] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7891 o... lane
- SYS$ERROR, 2>&1, and subprocesses (was RE: ... Craig A. Berry
- RE: [ID 20001127.007] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL78... Peter Prymmer