Hi,
     
     
     Just a follow up on this problem, here is the result of a trace level 
     5 log. Everything looks fine until whe hit the "prepare" statement.
     
     
    -> prepare for DBD::RDB::db (DBI::db=HASH(0x2e56f4)~0x2e56b8 'SELECT DEALNR,
 DEALSEQNR FROM DEAL WHERE CPTYMNEMONIC = ?')
    dbih_setup_handle(DBI::st=HASH(0x2e56e8)=>DBI::st=HASH(0x28b048), DBD::RDB::
st, 2e56dc, Null!)
    dbih_make_com(DBI::db=HASH(0x2e56b8), DBD::RDB::st, 168)
    dbih_setup_attrib(DBI::st=HASH(0x28b048), Err, DBI::db=HASH(0x2e56b8)) SCALA
R(0x2def5c) (already defined)
    dbih_setup_attrib(DBI::st=HASH(0x28b048), State, DBI::db=HASH(0x2e56b8)) SCA
LAR(0x2df04c) (already defined)
    dbih_setup_attrib(DBI::st=HASH(0x28b048), Errstr, DBI::db=HASH(0x2e56b8)) SC
ALAR(0x2dee54) (already defined)
    dbih_setup_attrib(DBI::st=HASH(0x28b048), Handlers, DBI::db=HASH(0x2e56b8))
ARRAY(0x2e6694) (already defined)
    dbih_setup_attrib(DBI::st=HASH(0x28b048), Debug, DBI::db=HASH(0x2e56b8)) 0 (
already defined)

Regards,

David Hansen

______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: DBD::RDB strangeness
Author:  David Hansen at ch,a,chicago,FX
Date:    05/03/01 07:44


Hello,

I have been using DBD::RDB for a while now without any problems. This was on VMS
7.2, with RDB v7.0.3-1.

We have a new machine with VMS 7.2 and RDB v7.0.6, which I want to use this 
package on.

I tried just copying all the important files related to the DBD package to the 
appropriate directories on that machine. When I now run the exact same perl 
script on the new machine, it seems to go to sleep in the 
DBD::RDB::st::_prepare() statement and never return. When I look at that 
process, its state is LEF (Local Event Flag).

Strangely enough, if I step through this program using the Perl/TK debugger 
"ptkdb", and I run to that statement and then do a "step over", it works. Once I
do this once, I can run the program to completion without a problem!

Is there a version issue here which forces me to rebuild DBD::RDB with the newer
version of RDB? Technically the 2 versions of RDB are supposed to be 
backwards-compatible, but that may be at an API and not binary level.

Regards,

David Hansen
UBS Warburg Switzerland


application/openmail-1166


Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
 
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free 
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If 
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This 
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or 
related financial instruments.

Reply via email to