At 08:52 AM 4/6/2001 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>Here's what I ended up doing.
>
>Change 9589 by jhi@alpha on 2001/04/06 13:42:23
>
> Define the U32_ALIGNMENT_REQUIRED only if it's not already defined.
That worked, thanks.
At 08:29 AM 4/6/2001 -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>Other than that, how's the snapshot looking in VMS?
All tests pass except sigaction.t #13. The sigaction call returns '0 but
true' but the test expects a return of undef. If I understand this right
(I'm completely new to Unix signal handling), the attempt to supply a
handler for SIGKILL is a no-no and the function should return an error in
this case. It's documented to do so in the Compaq C RTL manual but it
doesn't look like that's happening. Regardless of whether we live with the
failure or code around it, I don't think this should hold up a development
release.
