At 5:33 PM +1000 4/23/02, Ken Williams wrote: >On Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 03:55 PM, Craig A. Berry wrote: > >>At 9:17 PM -0400 4/22/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: >>>Think this should do it. >>[added /m to regex] >> >>Nope. I think you need something more like the following. At least it works for me: > >You didn't see the ^ at the beginning? Took me a while to see it too...
Doh! You're right.
