At 6:34 PM -0400 5/28/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > the "Socket nit" >mentioned in the Todo ought to be "bug in vendor supplied >tcp/ip stack - see vmsperl list for details", with maybe a >doc patch to README.vms warning of the problem >(something not herein enclosed).
Good show, Peter, though I think that should read "third party TCP/IP stack" rather than vendor.... If we want to be more generous-sounding, we could say it's an incompatibility between the vendor-supplied socket library and the third party IP stack. -- ________________________________________ Craig A. Berry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "... getting out of a sonnet is much more difficult than getting in." Brad Leithauser
