Craig Berry wrote:
!I think so, yes, though I'm still puzzled about why he hit this snag and no !one else has. I'm about to start a test run that incorporates all these !changes. I suspect that Martin might not have run with "-des". I note something disconcerting even with my doubly modified configure.com in that: $ sea configure.com define,sys$output/match=and Turns up inconsistency. !Well, I would simply move if from the "don't have" to the "have" list since we've seen !pretty good evidence that every VMS system in the last 15 years has had it. How about !this: ! !--- vms/perlvms.pod;-0 Sat Jun 1 12:03:52 2002 !+++ vms/perlvms.pod Mon Jun 24 11:37:46 2002 OK - it sounds like you are already on your way to integrating the patching. Will you do the honors of submitting to p5p then? Thank you. Peter Prymmer P.S. Don't forget to Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] since the patch alters perlport.pod and he likes to stay on top of any proposed changes to that file.
