On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 06:49:42PM +0100, jesper.naur wrote: > OK, *very* nice to have this mystery explained. When you start looking, don't > overlook the patch I supplied way back in: > > http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/vmsperl/2003-03/msg00098.html > > It does a respectable, but not completely bullet-proof, job of extracting the module > name from the file contents, rather than the file name.
Ok, I finally got around to looking at it. Its not nearly as frightening a work around as I'd thought. Its in the new snapshot on makemaker.org. -- You're more radiant than a memory of breathtaking ecstasy.
