On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 13:08:00 BST, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
>Gurusamy Sarathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>I'd argue that we shouldn't use File::Temp for other platforms
>>either due to the bloat factor.  I doubt there are any platforms
>>that don't support open(f, O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_RDWR, 0600), which
>>is really the only thing that is needed to write a functional
>>mkstemp().
>
>If that is so wonderously portable then why does change#19667 not 
>use mkstemp() for Win32?

It essentially does (note win32_tmpfd() is basically mkstemp()
without the template argument--we could add that if it is useful,
but I did not see a need for it for the tmpfile() stuff).

I use the low level APIs (rather than CRT's open()) to get the
DELETE_ON_CLOSE functionality.


Sarathy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to