Hi Craig,

Thanks so much. Of course, I did have this utility
stashed away in my vms perl directory, but I had
never installed it. Off to work we go.

Again, thanks for your help.

Carl Friedberg
Comet & Company
165 William St 9 NY NY 10038
www.comets.com
(212) 233-5470

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 10:50 PM
> To: Carl Friedberg
> Cc: 'vmsperl@perl.org'
> Subject: Re: any glue to sys$getrmi
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Carl Friedberg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to use a VMS perl interface to
> > sys$getrmi.
> >
> > I'm attempting to write my own version, but if
> > anyone has already started this effort and
> > has some ideas, or eve better, working code,
> > please contact me; offline is fine.
> >
> > If / when I get this done, it will get to
> > CPAN.
>
>
> Carl,
>
> I would think VMS::Monitor would do the trick:
>
> http://search.cpan.org/~dsugal/VMS-Monitor-0_06/monitor/monitor.pm
>
> It uses the EXE$GETSPI interface, which was the undocumented
> predecessor to SYS$GETRMI.  It should be a fairly mechanical operation
> to convert the $GETSPI calls to $GETRMI if that's needed for some
> reason, but whether the item codes are all still the same, whether all
> item codes of interest are included, whether it works as is on OVMS
> v8.3 and Itanium -- those are all unknowns here.  It might well run
> out of the box with no modifications, or it might need some TLC to get
> modern, but I can't think of any reason to reinvent the wheel or start
> from scratch.
>
> I'm believe, as with all of Dan's modules, I'm "co-maintainer" of this
> module, which means I can apply patches to the CPAN version if you
> send them in.
>
> _
> Craig A. Berry
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "... getting out of a sonnet is much more
>   difficult than getting in."
>                   Brad Leithauser
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.2/1609 - Release
> Date: 8/13/2008 6:43 AM
>

Reply via email to