Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 08:46:52AM -0600, John E. Malmberg wrote:
An additional note, this patch may cause some tests in vmsfspec.t to
fail. That is because the old behavior of pathfiy_dirspec() was
inconsistent with vmsify().
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 10:15:39AM -0600, John E. Malmberg wrote:
This is all needed for me to proceed with the testing of VMS perl in a
UNIX compatible mode. Currently most of the tests are passing.
My view (and on matters VMS specific I'm going to defer to Craig, if he
differs) is that if a needed change temporarily makes a known subset of
tests fail, then it should include a patch to make exactly those tests
TODO tests.
Point taken,
Attached is vms/ext/filespec.t that changes those tests to be passing.
A more complete version will come once I make sure that everything is ok
in the UNIX and extended file system support.
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
--- /rsync_root/perl/vms/ext/filespec.t Thu Mar 15 20:43:30 2007
+++ /ref1_root/perl/vms/ext/filespec.t Sun Dec 7 12:35:53 2008
@@ -100,14 +100,14 @@
__down_:[__the_.__garden_]__path_ pathify
__down_:[__the_.__garden_.__path_]
__down_:[__the_.__garden_]__path_. pathify # N.B. trailing . ==> null type
__down_:[__the_]__garden_.__path_ pathify undef
-/__down_/__the_/__garden_/__path_. pathify # N.B. trailing . ==> null type
-/__down_/__the_/__garden_.__path_ pathify undef
+/__down_/__the_/__garden_/__path_. pathify
/__down_/__the_/__garden_/__path__/
+/__down_/__the_/__garden_.__path_ pathify
/__down_/__the_/__garden____path_/
__down_:[__the_.__garden_]__path_.dir;2 pathify #N.B. ;2
__path_ pathify __path_/
/__down_/__the_/__garden_/. pathify /__down_/__the_/__garden_/./
/__down_/__the_/__garden_/.. pathify /__down_/__the_/__garden_/../
/__down_/__the_/__garden_/... pathify /__down_/__the_/__garden_/.../
-__path_.notdir pathify undef
+__path_.notdir pathify __path__notdir/
# Both VMS/Unix and file/path conversions
__down_:[__the_.__garden_]__path_.dir;1 unixpath
/__down_/__the_/__garden_/__path_/
